Lloyd on October 31st, 2017

“The Just shall live by faith”: the message that changed the world. Part 1.

Today, October 31st, 1517 (500 years ago) a penniless monk named Martin Luther posted his now-famous diatribe denouncing the corruption of the medieval world’s largest and most powerful institution, the Roman Catholic Church. His forerunners had been burned alive for similar statements, but Luther had a new tool at his disposal—the recently invented printing press.

Birth and education:

Martin Luther was born on 10 November 1483 in Eisleben, Saxony, then part of the Holy Roman Empire. He was sprinkled the next morning on the feast day of St. Martin of Tours. Historians will use the term baptism but this is incorrect for baptism is to immerse and the one day old Martin was certainly not immersed but sprinkled. His father was an ambitious man and wanted Martin, his eldest son to become a lawyer.

In 1501, at the age of 17, he entered university. Martin was very bright; God would use his intellect to propagate the message of faith and salvation. Martin would later translate the New Testament into German so the ordinary person could read or have read the bible in the local vernacular.

One must remember that the bible was in very short supply for it had to be copied by hand which took weeks if not months to do and by a number of people working flat out. Moreover, the only language the bible could be found in was Latin.

In accordance with his father’s wishes, Luther enrolled in law school at the same university that year but dropped out almost immediately, believing that law represented uncertainty. Luther sought assurances about life and was drawn to theology and philosophy.

Philosophy proved to be unsatisfying, offering assurance about the use of reason but none about loving God, which to Luther was more important. Reason could not lead men to God, he felt, and he thereafter developed a love-hate relationship with Aristotle over the latter’s emphasis on reason.

For Luther, reason could be used to question men and institutions, but not God. Human beings could learn about God only through divine revelation, he believed, and Scripture therefore became increasingly important to him.

He later attributed his decision to an event: on 2 July 1505, he was returning to university on horseback after a trip home. During a thunderstorm, a lightning bolt struck near him. Later telling his father he was terrified of death and divine judgment, he cried out, “Help! Saint Anna, I will become a monk!”

He came to view his cry for help as a vow he could never break. He left law school, sold his books, and entered St. Augustine’s Monastery in Erfurt on 17 July 1505.

Luther dedicated himself to the Augustinian order, devoting himself to fasting, long hours in prayer, pilgrimage, and frequent confession. He also went without sleep for days, endured bone-chilling cold without a blanket, and flagellating himself. As he later commented, “If anyone could have earned heaven by the life of a monk, it was I.”

Though he sought by these means to love God fully, he found no consolation. He was increasingly terrified of the wrath of God: “When it is touched by this passing inundation of the eternal, the soul feels and drinks nothing but eternal punishment.”

Luther described this period of his life as one of deep spiritual despair. He said, “I lost touch with Christ the Saviour and Comforter, and made of him the jailer and hangman of my poor soul.

Johann von Staupitz, his superior, pointed Luther’s mind away from continual reflection upon his sins toward the merits of Christ. He taught that true repentance does not involve self-inflicted penances and punishments but rather a change of heart. This simple truth though not fully grasped by Luther because of the indoctrination by Roman Catholicism it would serve him well in time to come.

Sadly, this legacy still binds Christians today. Believing its spiritual works above Christ.

He received a bachelor’s degree in Biblical studies on 9 March 1508, and another bachelor’s degree in 1509.

On 19 October 1512 (age 29) he was awarded his Doctor of Theology and, on 21 October 1512, was received into the senate of the theological faculty of the University of Wittenberg, having succeeded Staupitz as chair of theology. He spent the rest of his career in this position at the University of Wittenberg.

He was made provincial vicar of Saxony and Thuringia by his religious order in 1515 (age 31). This meant he was to visit and oversee each of eleven monasteries in his province.

In 1516, Johann Tetzel, a Dominican friar and papal commissioner for indulgences, was sent to Germany by the Roman Catholic Church to sell indulgences to raise money to rebuild St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome.

On 31 October 1517, Luther wrote to his bishop, Albrecht von Brandenburg, protesting the sale of indulgences. He enclosed in his letter a copy of his “Disputation of Martin Luther on the Power and Efficacy of Indulgences”, which came to be known as the Ninety-five Theses.

Hans Hillenbrand writes that Luther had no intention of confronting the church, but saw his disputation as a scholarly objection to church practices, and the tone of the writing is accordingly “searching, rather than doctrinaire.” Hillerbrand writes that there is nevertheless an undercurrent of challenge in several of the theses, particularly in Thesis 86, which asks: “Why does the pope, whose wealth today is greater than the wealth of the richest Crassus, build the basilica of St. Peter with the money of poor believers rather than with his own money?” The question was never answered instead the forces of the state would be mobilised to intimidate and later threaten Luther.

Luther objected, in particular, to a saying attributed to Johann Tetzel that “As soon as the coin in the coffer rings, the soul from purgatory (also attested as ‘into heaven’) springs.” At a time of gross spiritual darkness people couldn’t take the chance of not paying the money because the departed soul of a loved one must get to heaven even if that meant being indebted.

Luther, however, insisted that, since forgiveness was God’s alone to grant, those who claimed that indulgences absolved buyers from all punishments and granted them salvation were in error. Christians, he said, must not slacken in following Christ on account of such false assurances.

The Latin Theses were printed in several locations in Germany in 1517. In January 1518 friends of Luther translated the Ninety-five Theses from Latin into German. Within two weeks, copies of the theses had spread throughout Germany; within two months, they had spread throughout Europe.

Luther’s writings circulated widely, reaching France, England, and Italy as early as 1519. Students thronged to Wittenberg to hear Luther speak. He published a short commentary on Galatians and his Work on the Psalms. This early part of Luther’s career was one of his most creative and productive.

Three of his best-known works were published in 1520: To the Christian Nobility of the German Nation, On the Babylonian Captivity of the Church, and On the Freedom of a Christian.

From 1510 to 1520, Luther lectured on the Psalms, and on the books of Hebrews, Romans, and Galatians. As he studied these portions of the Bible, he came to view the use of terms such as penance and righteousness by the Catholic Church in new ways. He became convinced that the church was corrupt in its ways and had lost sight of what he saw as several of the central truths of Christianity.

The most important for Luther was the doctrine of justification – God’s act of declaring a sinner righteous – by faith alone through God’s grace. He began to teach that salvation or redemption is a gift of God’s grace, attainable only through faith in Jesus as the Messiah. “This one and firm rock, which we call the doctrine of justification”, he wrote, “is the chief article of the whole Christian doctrine, which comprehends the understanding of all godliness.”

Luther came to understand justification as entirely the work of God. He based his position on predestination on St. Paul’s epistle to the Ephesians 2:8–10. Against the teaching of his day that the righteous acts of believers are performed in cooperation with God, Luther wrote that Christians receive such righteousness entirely from outside themselves; that righteousness not only comes from Christ but actually is the righteousness of Christ, imputed to Christians (rather than infused into them) through faith.

“That is why faith alone makes someone just and fulfils the law,” he wrote. “Faith is that which brings the Holy Spirit through the merits of Christ.”

Faith, for Luther, was a gift from God; the experience of being justified by faith was “as though I had been born again.” His entry into Paradise, no less, was a discovery about “the righteousness of God” – a discovery that “the just person” of whom the Bible speaks (as in Romans 1:17) lives by faith.

The first and chief article is this: Jesus Christ, our God and Lord died for our sins and was raised again for our justification (Romans 3:24–25). He alone is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29), and God has laid on Him the iniquity of us all (Isaiah 53:6).

All have sinned and are justified freely, without their own works and merits, by His grace, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, in His blood (Romans 3:23–25). This is necessary to believe. This cannot be otherwise acquired or grasped by any work, law or merit. Therefore, it is clear and certain that this faith alone justifies us … Nothing of this article can be yielded or surrendered, even though heaven and earth and everything else falls (Mark 13:31).

Luther’s rediscovery of “Christ and His salvation” was the first of two points that became the foundation for the Reformation. His railing against the sale of indulgences was based on it.

Archbishop Albrecht of Mainz and Magdeburg did not reply to Luther’s letter containing the Ninety-five Theses. He had the theses checked for heresy and in December 1517 forwarded them to Rome. He needed the revenue from the indulgences to pay off a papal dispensation for his tenure of more than one bishopric. As Luther later noted, “the pope had a finger in the pie as well, because one half was to go to the building of St Peter’s Church in Rome”.

Pope Leo X, the then head of the Catholic Church, was used to reformers and heretics, and he responded slowly, “with great care as is proper.”

Note: In Revelation 2 verse 21, the bible says God gave “her space to repent but she would not”.

Over the next three years he deployed a series of papal theologians and envoys against Luther, which served only to harden the reformer’s anti-papal theology.

Luther’s boldest assertion in the debate was that Matthew 16:18 does not confer on popes the exclusive right to interpret scripture, and that therefore neither popes nor church councils were infallible. For this, Eck branded Luther a new Jan Hus, referring to the Czech reformer falsely accused of heresy who was burned at the stake in 1415. From that moment, he devoted himself to Luther’s defeat.


On 15 June 1520, the Pope warned Luther with the papal bull (edict) Exsurge Domine that he risked excommunication unless he recanted 41 sentences drawn from his writings, including the Ninety-five Theses, within 60 days.

Luther was excommunicated by Pope Leo X on 3 January 1521 after refusing to recant or withdraw his protests.

The enforcement of the ban on the Ninety-five Theses fell to the secular authorities. On 18 April 1521, Luther appeared as ordered before the Diet of Worms. This was a general assembly of the estates of the Holy Roman Empire that took place in Worms, a town on the Rhine. It was conducted from 28 January to 25 May 1521, with Emperor Charles V presiding. Prince Frederick III, Elector of Saxony, obtained a safe conduct for Luther to and from the meeting.

Johann Eck, speaking on behalf of the Empire as assistant of the Archbishop of Trier, presented Luther with copies of his writings laid out on a table and asked him if the books were his, and whether he stood by their contents. Luther confirmed he was their author, but requested time to think about the answer to the second question. He prayed, consulted friends, and gave his response the next day.

Unless I am convinced by the testimony of the Scriptures or by clear reason (for I do not trust either in the pope or in councils alone, since it is well known that they have often erred and contradicted themselves), I am bound by the Scriptures I have quoted and my conscience is captive to the Word of God. I cannot and will not recant anything, since it is neither safe nor right to go against conscience. May God help me. Amen.

Private conferences were held to determine Luther’s fate. The Emperor presented the final draft of the Edict of Worms on 25 May 1521, declaring Luther an outlaw, banning his literature, and requiring his arrest: “We want him to be apprehended and punished as a notorious heretic.”It also made it a crime for anyone in Germany to give Luther food or shelter. It permitted anyone to kill Luther without legal consequence.

Martin Luther was a prolific writer, preacher and church organiser despite suffering ill health for years, including Ménière’s disease, vertigo, fainting, tinnitus, and a cataract in one eye.

In 1536, he began to suffer from kidney and bladder stones, arthritis, and an ear infection ruptured an ear drum. In December 1544, he began to feel the effects of angina.

An apoplectic stroke deprived him of his speech, and he died shortly afterwards at 2:45 a.m. on 18 February 1546, aged 62.

At no time did Martin Luther the man whose revelation on faith call upon God for divine healing nor was there any that laid hands upon him as Christ said we should do, and James wrote that the elders should do, for his healing. This is because faith is often incremental not a Big Bang. We can have strong or great faith in one area of life for example soul salvation yet have no faith for healing.

Source: the Bible KJV and Wikipedia.

To be continued in part 2.

Our platform is the world and our congregation the people.

The Lord’s servant 

Lloyd Denny

Lloyd on October 31st, 2017


Today I listened to an extended interview on the radio of a seventy plus year old woman who while a young woman had three “backstreet abortions”, euphemism for illegal abortions. This woman was well educated and from a privilege background so having the abortions wasn’t because of a lack of education or poverty the two main reasons many western women give for having abortion.

The interview was conducted on the eve of the fiftieth year since abortions became legal in the UK, except for Northern Ireland . So the interview was to tell how it was for women before abortions became legal.

The final words of the woman when asked if she had any regrets (the interviewer was a woman), her response was no, adding “thank God”. I doubt that she meant thank God that she had three abortions but I think she meant thank God that the law was changed making it lawful to have an abortion because of the dangers of backstreet abortions.

Whilst I understand the dilemma women then and now have when finding out they are pregnant and don’t want to have the baby it still is wrong to abort the unborn child.

The word abort or abortion has been sanitised because it doesn’t truly convey what is involved in the process but simply put, it’s very ugly, messy and psychologically disturbing. So disturbing is the procedure that images of what happens cannot be shown on TV or any mainstream media. The Advertising Standards Agency, the BBC and all regulators will not allow such images to be shown.

Protestors against abortions who display such images in front of abortion clinics and other public places are vilified and accused of cruelty, bullying and of being offensive. What about the unborn child who is weeping for them? Photos of the unborn child are unmistakably human. The abortion procedure includes the dismemberment of the foetus piece by piece with a sharp instrument.

If such images were shown it is very doubtful that the law would remain unchanged; there is talk of changing the law to make it easier to have an abortion in that it should only require limited pre-counselling and that a termination should be allowed to take place beyond twenty four weeks, the current maximum. There is exception to this rule if the mother’s life is at risk or there are foetal abnormalities, then there is no limit. There is also no age limit for treatment.

Will the law change in terms of making it illegal? Not in my life time and perhaps never for the argument against it is not encouraged for “it’s the woman’s right to choose” and it’s “her body”.

Abortion has nothing to do with God, indeed God disapproves, and it’s a sin because it is the wilful taking of life. The unborn child is protected by its mother in the womb where it develops for nine months and then at the appointed time it forces the mother to allow it to leave. When it is born it gets all the support of the law and cannot be neglected, abused or hurt in any way. Society is very hard on anyone who fails to look after the baby right through to adulthood. As an adult we are protected from harm and in particular any attempt to kill us. Murder is still the highest and most heinous of crimes.

As a society we have become desensitised to the act of abortion. The very word is euphemism for something very bad and ugly. Each new generation is even more insensitive to the act because the images are hidden, debate is shut down and the voice of protestors are made to appear offensive, cruel and even unchristian.

Finally, there are many things we must give God thanks for but abortion is certainly not one of them.

Our platform is the world and our congregation the people.

 The Lord’s servant

 Lloyd Denny

Lloyd on October 24th, 2017


[19] Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his. And, Let everyone that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity. [20] But in a great house there are not only vessels of gold and of silver, but also of wood and of earth; and some to honour, and some to dishonour. [21] If a man therefore purge himself from these, he shall be a vessel unto honour, sanctified, and meet for the master’s use, and prepared unto every good work. (2 Timothy 2:19-21) KJV.

It is shocking how those with a political agenda can excuse the behaviour of leaders with whom they have affinity or have preference. This is not only true in politics but sadly also in the church. To side with one political leader over another on the basis of politics is expected for this is not only normal but is logical. I support my friend and political soul mate this is what is known as being partisan, the very word is a clue.

However, when God, the church or the Bible is used then it’s shameful. Some even go as far as prophesying that support for their political person is approved by God and anyone who criticises such a one is in danger of displeasing God or bringing the judgment of God upon themselves. How ridiculous and offensive.

The bible lists many leaders: prophets, priests and kings who behaved badly and certainly was not approved by God. Ahab was a rightful king in Israel but he was an offender and was opposed by Elijah.

The prophet Micaiah also opposed Ahab yet he was supported by many prophets who all thought the king was beyond reproach and even in office with the approval of God.

In the text above, Apostle Paul writes that it’s the seal of God that identifies us as belonging to God. By belonging I mean approved by God and used by God. Then he writes all who would invoke the name of The Lord by claiming to be a servant of God, a child of God, a believer, born again or simply a Christian, must depart from iniquity (lawlessness, immorality or grossly unfair behaviour. Wickedness, sinfulness, impropriety, vice, evil, sin etc).

Then he writes about the many vessels which are in a great house that are to honour and dishonour. Some vessels are low in value, some very expensive; some used all the time and some used on special occasions.

King Nebuchadnezzar is described as a servant of God because he would be used to discipline Israel for their sins. Nebuchadnezzar did some very bad things when he invaded Israel. He later ruled over Israel with a strong arm. God did not approve of his life as a man. At one point the king lost his mind for seven years during which his hair grew, as did his nails and lived out in the open as a wild beast. I am sure his supporters excused his madness even then.

Cyrus the Great was also a servant of God also in respect of the nation of Israel. This same Cyrus issued the decree to build the walls in Jerusalem. Despite carrying out God’s plan for Israel did not mean his sinful ways were exonerated by God.

Paul then makes it clear that to be a vessel of honour one had to purge themselves from these (sin, immorality, evil, vice, unfair behaviour etc) in order to become a vessel of honour fit for the Master’s use.

When President Trump got elected I wrote that God will help him if he humbles himself. It wasn’t so much that he was God’s servant of honour, far from it, but rather God could use him despite his obvious inabilities. Its one thing to be well qualified to be president and getting into trouble because of pride but to get into trouble when one is patently unqualified because of pride is foolish in the extreme.

Pride is foolish at all levels of leadership but it’s especially foolish for those in high office because it leads to destruction. God resists the proud.

It was pride that caused king Nebuchadnezzar to live like a wild beast for seven years. It was pride that precipitated the overthrow and death of many despots and it was pride that led to Satan being cast out of heaven.

Still many Christian leaders are unwilling to let Mr Trump know he is behaving badly. Every wrong is received in silence and those who speak defend his wrong. The prophet Nathan went to King David and told him he had blood on his hands for orchestrating the death of Uriah. Then David said to Nathan, ‘I have sinned against the Lord.’ And Nathan said to David, ‘The Lord also has put away your sin; you shall not die”. (2 Samuel 12:13).  

King Ahab of Israel invites king Jehoshaphat of Judah to join him in a battle. Jehoshaphat is not convinced that the battle is justified. He suggests to Ahab that they consult the prophet to find out if God would give the go ahead. At a flash Ahab produces hundreds of prophets who give the go ahead in the name of The Lord. King Jehoshaphat is suspicious at the unanimity and asks if there was another independent minded prophet they could consult. Ahab says there is another and his name is Micaiah but he is in prison because he hates me for he never says anything good about me.

Jehoshaphat insists they consult Micaiah and he is brought out of prison. Before he is brought before the two kings he is briefed by Ahab’s servants to say what the other prophets had said. On being brought before the two kings he says what he was told to say. Ahab is surprised so he insists that Micaiah speak the truth. The prophet then went on to speak a word from God which in effect said don’t engage in this battle for if you do many will die including the king of Israel. Ahab with the support of Jehoshaphat went to war and was killed. The story of Micaiah and his encounter with Ahab can be found in 1 Kings 22.

I do hope Mr Trump will humble himself because America needs good leadership for its in trouble. The world needs good leadership for there is great uncertainty and fear. If he does humble himself and purge himself then he will not only be a successful leader but also a vessel of honour prepared unto every good work.

Our platform is the world and our congregation the people.

The Lord’s servant  

Lloyd Denny


Lloyd on October 13th, 2017

“The love of money is the root of all evil”.

China is now the second largest economy in the world and is projected that within the next five years it will take over the number one spot from America.

China, a one party state with limited freedom, still communist in ideology and government has enjoyed double digit economic growth for more than a decade and even now with universal slow down, still has healthy economic growth year on year.

When I was in school in the 1970’s the USSR and China were the largest communist blocs in the world. The oppressed of the world sought refuge in the USSR and China because they welcome them with open arms. People from Africa would go for schooling in USSR and were very well looked after. In fact a number of African freedom fighters were educated in the USSR.

China then was a closed society that didn’t let many in or their people out. Those who came to the west were from Hong Kong, then still a British colony.

Both were relatively poor in comparison with western democracies. Both followed a command and control economic system; both had full employment even if that meant inventing jobs for people and both had low wages; the state provided housing and from birth to death welfare system.

There was a short time in the 1970’s and early 1980’s where more than half the world population were under a communist regime. This made the West afraid and did all it could to stop more countries becoming communist so anything that looked too left wing or socialist was a threat. This threat was met with attempts at destabilisation of the country, regime change and even assassination.

State sponsored terror is illegal and would bring a prime minister or president down if they are caught but still it happened because of the threat from communism.

In the end the USSR collapsed and the west breathed a collective sigh of relief. With the collapse came nationalism, western style democracy, market economies and soon afterwards the love of money.

With the love of money has come: prostitution, alcoholism, drug addiction, xenophobia and racism. The people of these former soviet bloc countries have not changed because of genetics or because they feel threatened by outsiders coming in they have changed because of a love of money.

The love of money makes us greedy, selfish, protectionist and evil. We build high walls around our homes not just to be safe from robbers but to keep others out. The rich entertain, they throw lavish parties and are quick to show off what they have so it’s not really about keeping people out, but it is about keeping certain people out. Certain people might include: the poor, lower classes and certain races.

In the case of China, this still communist country, has the taste of money and like it. China has more billionaires than all other countries except the USA. China straddles Africa and the Caribbean with its money buying up resources, land and status in these countries yet more and more people are saying that Chinese people are not friendly and even racist.

China is allowing visitors into mainland China but people especially black people are complaining of racism.

Saudi Arabia and many other wealthy Arab countries are some of the most racist countries in the world and again this is due to the love of money. Before they discovered oil these very poor countries of desert dwellers and nomads were friendly to outsiders. Africans and Arabs got on well as equals but not now. Despite being near neighbours the Arabs treat the African as servants and slaves.

Have you noticed how unwilling these very wealthy Arab countries are to respond to global disasters. Millions have been forced out of Southern Sudan and Yemen but no help from Saudi Arabia. Yet a much poorer country like Kenya has allowed hundreds of thousands of people from Somalia into her country and even look after them.

Donald Trump won the presidency of America with a promise to build a very high wall to keep Mexicans out. Mexico a near neighbour, saddled with debt, corruption and prone to natural disasters is vilified as rapists, bandits and lazy. A caricature designed to make Americans afraid to lose what they believe they have.

America that became a nation through immigration. A people who fled Europe and elsewhere so they could practise their faith, make a new start and get away from persecution were at first very welcoming to all. Note the Statue of Liberty.

As soon as it became prosperous it became nasty. Settlers soon turn on their hosts the Indians, and in quick time almost wiped them out.

The love of money is indeed the root of all evil no wonder Jesus told the rich young ruler to give away his riches to the poor and then come follow him and it’s easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for the rich to enter the kingdom of heaven.

Our platform is the world and our congregation the people. 

The Lord’s servant 

Lloyd Denny

Lloyd on October 13th, 2017

“Minority Report

“Wherefore seeing we also are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset us, and let us run with patience the race that is set before us”. (Hebrews 12:1 KJV).

Recently the latest British Social Attitude survey reporting on religious faith in England and Wales showed that for the first time ever more people say they don’t have a faith than that they do. Furthermore, that fewer and fewer people say they attend a church service.

The analysis throws up striking regional variations. London has the smallest proportion of people identifying as “nones”, at an average of 40%, accounted for by the capital’s large minority ethnic population. In contrast, 59.5% of people in Wales say they have no religion. Wales the birthplace of great revivals.

The report was met with glee in some quarters, indifference by some and sadness by others. When I hear such reports and comments by the usual suspects it fills me with a mix of sadness but also an urge to do more to strengthen Christian witness in this country.

The headline report that more people said they had no religious faith was music to atheists, agnostics and secular humanists in our country. Despite the headline I believe atheists are still a minority in the UK and they definitely are a minority in our world.

That said, increasingly minorities are holding the majority to ransom. After all we are in the Laodicean church age (See Revelation Chapter 3), the age of human rights.

Throughout history the minority has suffered at the hands of the majority and at times this has meant persecution and mass killing almost to genocide.

The minority was persecuted for their faith, because of their race or nationality and even because of their tribe. Persecution of minorities is morally wrong and where it is encouraged by law it’s doubly wrong. For example, the early Christians were persecuted by their fellow Jews and later by the Roman authorities.

The Roman Catholic Church for centuries persecuted and killed millions of Christians who differed from them in terms of doctrine and practice. Please read Foxes book of martyrs for information on this great persecution.

In many places in the world the minority are still suffering at the hands of the majority because they are stronger, have access to power and sometimes the law is with them. The majority also believe it has the right to enforce its will for after all in a vote or in a fight they are expected to win. I get it and I am sure you do too.

What then is the point behind this blog? Well I was praying and from my mouth came the words “the few are getting the better over the many”. I was praying about the influence the few were having on social policy even to the point of changing laws. Social change is often driven by a minority and somehow the majority is forced to go along with change through apathy, tolerance and slumber.

Take for example, the purchase and use of guns in America; the overwhelming majority believe there should be improved gun control. It’s ridiculous that a fourteen year old boy cannot buy alcohol or cigarette or even a lottery ticket, yet can buy a gun and as many bullets as he can afford.

Recently I saw a short DIY film posted on social media that said Jesus never existed despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary for more than two millennia.

The re-writing of history as in the case of holocaust deniers by some historians, or so called new findings by geologists and anthropologists of rocks dating back billions of years or fossils claiming that our human ancestors have been found in the form of some primate is not new but with social media has taken on a new and dangerous form.

Fake news can be peddled by a teenager in his room simply making things up. Fake news is also produced by media outlets with an agenda. Fake news can also be produced by atheists and secular humanists whose agenda is to turn many, especially the young, away from the knowledge of God and in particular the Bible.

The books of Genesis and Revelation are usually the target of those who want to turn people off the bible. Very few have the audacity to deny major figures like Moses, David and Jesus Christ but believe it or not there are those who are doing so and persuading others to join them.

So once again the minority is seeking to win over the majority not based on truth or sound evidence but based entirely on their own agenda. Satan is the father of lies and sadly many are willing to do his bidding. Yet Satan according to the bible believes in one God and fears and tremble yet he persuades some that there is no God.

Jesus in one of his parables said the kingdom of God (the church), would grow and grow even though sometimes wildly, to the very end.

In the text at the start of this blog, the writer of Hebrews draws attention to the many cloud of witnesses that attests to the truths in the bible. Witnesses like the prophet Isaiah who foretold the gruesome death of Messiah in gory details or Daniel who saw and made known his visions concerning the great empires of the world from Babylon to Rome in great detail. For example, he describes the rise and fall of Alexander the Great and the breakup of Greece.

There are more than 1.3 billion Christians in our world with the overwhelming majority of people having a faith so let us not allow the minority to get the upper hand in the media, educational establishments and social policy.

Much of the social woes that plague the western world are because we have turned away from God, the bible and church. We have in the words of the prophet Isaiah: “All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned everyone to his own way”. (Isaiah 53:6).

Neither should the majority seek to oppress the minority. Persuade yes, help yes, but no to persecution or intolerance.

Our platform is the world and our congregation the people. 

The Lord’s servant 

Lloyd Denny

Lloyd on October 5th, 2017

“Our thoughts and prayers”

Once again another mass killing with guns in the USA, this time in Las Vegas.

Last Sunday night the day of the mass shooting, I was in church here in Luton and we were looking at the weapons which are formed against believers and non believers which are designed to destroy and to kill. We left the service with a better understanding and a determination to be vigilant and to watch in prayer for each other.

That evening in the USA, a retired accountant who had for a number of days booked himself into a hotel with an arsenal of high velocity weapons and enough bullets to kill many hundreds of people waited for the moment when the crowd attending an open air concert at the back of the hotel had gathered. Then without any warning he started shooting and shooting indiscriminately into the crowd, stopping only to reload and to get another gun. Apparently, he had more than forty guns some modified to operate as semi automatic weapons.

It was later reported that the shooting lasted for less than ten minutes and only came to an end when he turned one of his guns on himself. Nearly 60 people lay dead, badly cut up by the many bullets which sprayed the crowd with more than 500 people wounded, some critically.

Not surprisingly the news soon travelled across the world and America is stopped in its tracks once again having to respond to the latest atrocity.

Every time such an atrocity takes place in America a number of responses can be predicted: we must do something about guns; we must ban certain calibre of guns; we must make it difficult for people to buy guns; guns don’t kill people, its people who kill people; it’s our constitutional right to carry a gun.

One other response especially from leaders especially the president is: “our thoughts and prayers” are with the victims and some add with their family.

I pray often and daily for I know God answers prayer. Jesus told me that I must ask, seek and knock. That men ought always to pray and not faint.

Through prayer I offload unto God, get clarity from God and get direction from God. It’s not the eloquence of my prayer that matters or the many words I use but what really matters is the one who is hearing one’s prayer. The Baal prophets prayed and prayed from morning to evening and nothing happened. Elijah prayed a few words and his prayer was immediately answered for all to see.

Idols cannot hear. Fictitious gods cannot hear. Prayer in the name of The Lord Jesus is the key. Peter and John prayed for a crippled man who was placed outside the temple in Jerusalem to beg. One day these two ministers healed him of his condition and were lauded by the people for they knew a notable miracle had been done to that man that day.

Peter and John refused the plaudits instead made it clear that it was faith in the name of Jesus that made the man perfectly whole. I believe in the God who answers prayer so I am committed to prayer.

Notwithstanding, too often when there is an atrocity the phrase “our thoughts and prayers” is I believe euphemism for doing nothing. The shooting in America will probably not bring any change so it’s just a matter of time till the next atrocity. Most worryingly though, is the trend that mass murderers are killing more and more people as if each must kill more than the previous.

The phrase thoughts and prayers is also true for some churches, ministers and believers. Prayer is substitute for doing something. There is an issue that needs fixing or dealing with and it’s in our powers to fix the problem many are inclined to do nothing.

How do I know this? I know this because even if God spoke we are inclined to stop doing what we started if there is no immediate results; forgetting that it took God six days to create the world and rested on the seventh day.

Moses led the children of Israel out of Egypt and there they stood at the shore of the Red Sea crying to Moses that they were doomed because Pharaoh’s army was in hot pursuit. Moses turns to God to find out what to do. God tells him to go forward, that is, to head towards the Red Sea. The Red Sea is parted and the people cross over on dry land.

Too many leaders would have called a prayer meeting right there and then forgetting that for 400 years the people had been praying and it was time to listen to God and go forward.

I am amazed how experienced ministers will call for a time of prayer at a time of difficulties and yet be unwilling to do anything even after God has spoken.

Faith without works, says James, is dead. There is no greater expression of faith than prayer but we must act after we have prayed. King Jehoshaphat is troubled at the news that an enemy was planning to invade his country and said he must surrender for Judah was no match for him.

The king goes into the temple and prays. An unnamed prophet gives him a word from God that he need not fight for the “battle is the Lord’s”. King Jehoshaphat went home and told the singers to get ready to sing ahead of the army.

On the night Jesus was arrested he prayed three times in the garden of Gethsemane but as soon as he got through he got up and moved on to fulfil the will of God.

In conclusion, I believe in the importance of prayer especially instant prayers. However, it must not be used as euphemism for doing nothing.

Luke the writer of the gospel that bears his name and the book of Acts begins Acts with these words: “The former treatise have I made, O Theophilus, of all that Jesus began both to do and teach”. Acts 1:1.

God is a doing God. The patriarchs, prophets, the apostles and Christ himself were doers of the word but they prayed also.

Our platform is the world and our congregation the people.

The Lord’s servant

Lloyd Denny

Lloyd on October 4th, 2017

“All Israel shall be saved”

In my previous blog I wrote about a dream I recently had in which I left a question for a certain bible scholar to answer which he couldn’t. The blog was titled: “The things of the Spirit are spiritually discerned”.

The things of God wrote Apostle Paul, are spiritually discerned: his word, dreams and visions. Jesus taught by Parables which are also spiritually discerned.

The word discern means: to see, perceive, detect, recognise, notice, spot etc.

Discerned is the past tense of discern.

Therefore, spiritually discerned means to see, perceive, detect, recognise etc by the spirit. God who is Spirit communicates with our human spirit.

The born again spirit is alive unto God which is the best definition of being born again. God again, according to Apostle Paul, bears witness with our spirit that we are his children. If then children expect to be led.

Jesus asked his disciples whom do men say I the son of man am? Various names were given. The follow up question was whom do you say I am? No one spoke for this was a very big question. Then the silence broke, “thou art the Christ (Messiah), the Son of the living God” declared Peter.

No equivocation, no edging of bet, no sitting on the fence. “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God”.

“Flesh and blood (human learning, intellect, brain power, guess work) did not reveal this to you but my Father (the God of all spirits, the Heavenly Father) revealed this to you”.

The word of God is spiritually discerned in that it must be understood through our spirit.

When the church was established it was characterised by various phenomena: fire, heavenly sounds, diverse tongues and miraculous healing. The detractors could not explain away the things that were being done for they happened in public and were reported on by others not the disciples. The only criticism they could level at the disciples of Christ was that they were unlearned and ignorant.

Yet these so called unlearned and ignorant men went on to establish the church: through sound doctrines, good administration and governance and holy practices.

Apostle Peter on the day of Pentecost (Acts 1 and 2) in response to those who said the disciples were drunk declared that what the massive crowd was witnessing that early morning was a fulfilment of Joel’s prophecy concerning the universal outpouring of the Holy Spirit. Up until then if you were to have asked Peter what Joel meant I doubt he could have explained the prophecy, because the word is spiritually discerned.

Let me now turn to the subject of this blog. The word Israel was given to Jacob after he had an encounter with the angel, whom I believe was God. After this encounter Jacob was never the same again. Jacob refused to let go the angel saying he needed to be blessed first. The angel touched one of his thighs and thereafter he never walked the same again and indeed was never the same again. God then renamed Jacob, Israel which means prince of God.

Israel then is the name for the man who was changed after a divine encounter. The descendants of Israel the man were called the children of Israel. By the time of the prophets the nation was simply referred to as Israel or Judah and sometimes Ephraim.

The Apostle Paul, in his letter to the church at Rome bemoans the condition of his people the Jews. In chapter 10 he writes: “Brethren, my heart’s desire and prayer to God for Israel is that they might be saved. [2] For I bear them record that they have zeal of God, but not according to knowledge”.

He later gives a brilliant summary of their plight over the centuries which culminated in their wholesale rejection of Jesus as the Messiah or Christ. However, he wrote, the calamity that has befallen the Jews was not unknown to God; indeed He used this calamity to open up the kingdom to the nations.

As an analogy, a loving father builds a huge house for his nearest and dearest and their friends and neighbours. Many of his closest relatives are reluctant to live at the house preferring to go their own way. The father then opens the house to the friends and neighbours. It was the father’s intention all along to open the house to the friends and neighbours but gave preferential treatment to his nearest and dearest.

It was God’s will all along, wrote Paul for the Gentiles to enter the kingdom of God but those closest to Messiah, the Jews, were unwilling to enter so the Gentiles rushed in.

Has God forgotten the Jews? Asked Paul, no was the answer; for he too and most of the leaders in the church at the time were Jews. What will happen to the rest asks Paul? God will bring them in but through the church.

Paul entered the church at conversion and did a great deal to define and establish the church. He uses Isaiah’s words to explain. “And the Redeemer shall come to Zion, and unto them that turn from transgression in Jacob, saith the Lord”. (Isaiah 59:20).

With the birth of the church Apostle Paul goes from the future tense of Isaiah to present continuous tense when he wrote that the deliverer shall come out of Zion and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob. (Romans 11:26). The key phrase is the Redeemer shall first come to Zion as our Lord did in building the church to the Redeemer shall come out of Zion.

Through Christ the Redeemer, Gentiles are brought into the kingdom of God and so too the Jews.

All Israel shall indeed be saved but this refers to the born again Jew. There are Jews who don’t believe in God and despise the name of Jesus. There are Jews who reject the New Testament and hate the church as do many Gentiles.

Jesus told the learned Nicodemus “you must be born again to see and enter the Kingdom of God”. 

So all Israel shall be saved but only the born again ones for it is written, again by Paul, “for he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: [29] But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God”. (Romans 2:28-29). 

Our platform is the world and our congregation the people. 

The Lord’s servant 

Lloyd Denny



Lloyd on October 3rd, 2017

“The things of the Spirit are spiritually discerned”

1 Corinthians 2:14-16 KJV

[14] But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. [15] But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man. [16] For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? But we have the mind of Christ.

Last night I dreamt I was in a long and at times heated debate with a number of bible scholars about the scriptures and in particular Romans 9 through to 11.

Try as I may I just couldn’t get through to a particular person. To start with he went on and on never giving others including me a chance to help him understand that what he was saying was incorrect. The others in the debate knew he was wrong but they too couldn’t convince him he was wrong for he wouldn’t listen.

In the dream I am asking myself why wouldn’t he listen and a number of reasons are given. Top of the list was his natural mind. This man was a PHD, one who was fluent in Hebrew and Greek, I certainly wasn’t in the dream and certainly not in wake.

He was utterly convinced he must be correct because he was able to trace back to the original Greek every word in Romans 9 through to 11 and other parts of the New Testament. All I wanted him to do was to listen for a while so I could give my explanation of the scripture but no. Another scholar had sympathy on me for although in essence his background was similar to this man, in that he also was a PHD and took a very similar line to this other man at least he believed I should get an opportunity to explain the scriptures.

After some time trying to say something in my frustration I decided to walk away for I was getting nowhere and felt if I continued I would become angry.

On seeing that I was about to walk away the man who would not let me speak stopped speaking. I then asked a question with the intention of leaving it with him to ponder for I didn’t expect him to want to hear my explanation.

The question was, what did Paul mean when he wrote: “And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob”: (Romans 11:26).

Try as he may he couldn’t answer the question. He went into Jewish history: their persecution, the early Jewish leaders of the church, the Gentiles getting saved because of the Jews. Many words were said and both I and the other scholar were not impressed.

I then cited Jews that I knew of who were atheists, big time sinners, some truly bad people; will they be saved I asked? For Paul said all Israel shall be saved? Again he had another go but couldn’t convince anyone and judging from his body language he hadn’t convinced himself either. The other person had a go at explaining the text but didn’t quite get it right either. Shortly afterwards I woke up and decided to write this blog.

In conclusion, I am not saying the scholar or PHD cannot understand the scriptures but one cannot approach the scripture with the natural mind no matter how educated.

Apostle Paul with all his education did not see Jesus as Messiah and that the church was of God.

It was he who after conversion would write: “Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more: [5] Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee; [6] Concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.  

[7] But what things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ. [8] Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ. 

[9] And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith: [10] That I may know him, and the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his sufferings, being made conformable unto his death; [11] If by any means I might attain unto the resurrection of the dead.  

[12] Not as though I had already attained, either were already perfect: but I follow after, if that I may apprehend that for which also I am apprehended of Christ Jesus.  

[13] Brethren, I count not myself to have apprehended: but this one thing I do , forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forth unto those things which are before, [14] I press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus”. (Philippians 3: 4-14).

Apostle Paul was willing to renounce things he had learnt about God and the study of scripture. As a Pharisee he would have studied the scriptures a certain way. A way based on intellect and not the Spirit for he didn’t have the Spirit of God.

Through the Spirit Paul has given the church and the world a deep understanding of God. His words to the Corinthians are the title of this blog.

Smith Wigglesworth the well known Pentecostal Evangelist from Bradford, England said on more than one occasion: “Some people read their Bibles in Hebrew, some in Greek; I like to read mine in the Holy Ghost”.

In the next blog I will give my explanation of the statement “all Israel shall be saved”.

Our platform is the world and our congregation the people. 

The Lord’s servant 

Lloyd Denny


Lloyd on September 21st, 2017

“Lord, help thou my belief”.

In the gospel of Mark chapter 9, it records a story of a father on hearing that nothing was impossible to him that believes after seeing the miraculous delivery of his son, cried out at his unbelieving heart: “Lord, I believe, help thou my unbelief”. 

On more than one occasion the disciples of Jesus asked our Lord to increase their faith, forgive their unbelief and to help them to believe for nothing was impossible with God.

After Pentecost, the power to bear witness and to operate in the miraculous came to the early church such that their faith was relentless and unquenchable.

They healed the sick, performed miracles and even raised the dead. On one occasion a local church refused to bury a church sister who had died prematurely.

Instead, they dressed her, not for the grave but for life, placed her on a bed and went and fetched Apostle Peter who was nearby to come pray.

They would have prayed for her yet it did not stop them calling Peter to pray also.

Peter duly came, just like Jesus who came to the home of Lazarus four days after his death. Peter spoke to God and then spoke to the dead sister commanding her back to life. God heard Peter’s prayer and his faith in the name of Jesus brought the dead sister back to life. See Acts chapter 9 for the full story.

The title of the blog is “help thou my belief” because increasingly I am finding too many believers are critical of those who believe God for the impossible. Instead of encouraging or asking God to help them believe it’s easier to criticise those who believe. We must be wise, where is the power that the early church had? These comments are made by people who really don’t believe by acting but only hypothetically.

I have been in too many services where there are comments after comments, song after song all attesting to the power of God and yet there are sick folks in the midst who are ignored. The main reason for this lack of faith is the low priority given to the word of faith in too many meetings.

Too many services are dominated by singing: the moderator, choirs, the congregation and preachers so there is very little time for the word of faith. Furthermore, the word always come at the very end after hours of “other  stuff” so by the time what is passed off as the word is given the saints are tired and the unsaved want to go home. The poor preacher then is expected to give catchphrases, homilies and slogans which are insufficient to produce faith.

In my travels as a preacher, where singing is in another language and there is no choir and musical instruments I use the time to build faith and always without exception, God manifests his power to save, heal and work miracles. Sometimes the miracle is immediate but as often it is over time. The book of Revelation opens with the Apostle John being in the spirit. He is all alone, no choir or music to pump him up but he steps into the world of the Spirit.

Let us keep believing God for all things are possible to him that believes. Another reason people are sometimes unwilling to believe despite their protestations of faith is because not every person or situation we pray for will be successful in our terms.

Daniel prayed but still ended up in the lion’s den. His three brothers ended up in the fiery furnace. Stephen was stoned to death, James along with nine of the original twelve disciples were martyred for their faith. Paul and practically all the early apostles were similarly martyred for their faith. In the case of Paul he like John the Baptist before him was beheaded. How ignominious.

Jesus healed lepers but not every leper in the city or country. Jesus raised the dead but many still had to bury their dead. Jesus also raised Lazarus from the dead after being in the tomb four days but stopped short of raising others from the grave.

Let us believe God and keep on doing so but we cannot guarantee that everyone we pray for will be miraculously healed or brought back from the dead. This is not our prerogative, that’s God’s. Ours is to believe.

Make room for the word of God in our services. With the word comes faith. When faith is in the heart of the preacher, the congregation and the people we will see the power of God. No histrionics, no hype and certainly no fakery.

Our platform is the world and our congregation the people. 

The Lord’s servant. 

Lloyd Denny


Lloyd on September 21st, 2017

“To believe or not to believe, that is the question”.

There are many who believe in God but sadly will be lost. By lost I mean will end up in hell.

Simply believing without acting on one’s belief is not sufficient. Satan believes in God but is destined to be bound in everlasting chains.

Apostle Paul in his letter to the Roman church bemoans the condition of his people by saying that they were lost for they had zeal but not according to knowledge.

To truly believe one has to act or do what one is required to do. For example, to truly believe one has to first repent. To truly believe for a miracle or divine intervention one has to act.

Naaman the leper had to wash himself seven times in the river Jordan for him to be cleansed of his leprosy.

The widow had to act upon the word of the prophet by baking a cake for him first from her meagre supply.

Peter and John told the crippled man to get up and walk and he ignored his past condition and attempted to get up. As he did he found he could walk.

Jesus spat on the ground mixed his spittle in the dust and applied it to the eyes of a man that was born blind then told him to go and wash his eyes in the nearby pool. The man went and did what he was told to do and came back fully sighted.

I could go on and on but I am sure you get the point.

So, believing is important but it must be acted upon for as James wrote: “faith without works (action) is dead”.

As Apostle Paul wrote that zeal without knowledge did not save the Jewish people of his day for they needed a preacher to bring to them the knowledge of Christ people today need the knowledge of God.

There are many belief systems in our world today. People who sincerely believe but still will be lost for knowledge is important. People perish for lack of knowledge.

I hope I have convinced you that true belief requires action and belief and the proper action is based on knowledge.

Not believing or unbelief is even worse than believing incorrectly. That is why atheism and secular humanism is the single greatest danger to men and women today. This didn’t happen over night for I have traced this danger back to the Philadelphian church message in  Revelation chapter 3. In the message to the church of Philadelphia our Lord warned against “the great temptation that would come upon the world to try men”. I believe this is a reference to the rise in atheism and secular humanism. I invite the reader to read blog number 256 which provides the narrative to my assertion.

Too many young people and their parents in the West refuse to believe in God. They reject the very idea. They are unwilling to show even intellectual curiosity. They have hardened their hearts against God, the Bible and the church. Governments are the same which explains why there are no legal boundaries; as long as there is a backer, sometimes one person with media influence or parliamentary support, a law can be introduced or changed.

They can be polite but dismissive, they can he reasonable but intolerant and they can be logical but unwilling to find out. I have met teenagers who dismiss the idea of God without reading the Bible, going to a church, speaking to a preacher or even saying a prayer.

Not long ago I met a man outside our church building in Luton and I invited him to visit us one day of his choosing. I spoke about the good things that takes place in a church service he was unwilling to entertain the idea. I appealed to his rational mind by saying he could come and see for himself that if after a few minutes he found it not to his liking he could leave. I even said that if he didn’t want to come to a service he could meet me during the day for a conversation. All my appeal fell on deaf ears and a hardened heart.

Unbelief is folly and the very worst form of foolishness. Most unbelievers think they are rational and logical yet are unwilling to try Jesus or to speak to a preacher sent by God. It must be a preacher that is truly sent by God.

Logic tells us that if we use the best surgeon it is more likely that our operation will be successful. The best trial court lawyer gives the defendant the best chance of an acquittal and a preacher sent by God will help us know God.

John the Baptist persuaded many to believe in God for he was a preacher sent by God and as a result many were saved from the wrath to come.

Jesus was sent by God and countless number has been saved from the wrath to come.

As Paul identified that the answer to the salvation of the Jews was based on preaching the word of God to them so the answer to unbelief is to preach and teach the word of God.

Let us use all the modern media to propagate the gospel for as it is written: “now faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the word of God”.

Our platform is the world and our congregation the people.

The Lord’s servant 

Lloyd Denny